Professional skepticism is defined as an attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence. This mindset is fundamental to identifying material misstatements due to fraud or error during the audit process.
1. Questioning Mindset: Auditors should consistently ask whether the information and evidence obtained during the audit makes sense, applying a "trust but verify" approach.
2. Critical Thinking: Evaluating evidence with professional judgment, without assuming that management is inherently honest or dishonest.
3. Diligence: Ensuring that explanations provided by management are not accepted at face value but are tested against corroborating evidence.
4. Independence and Objectivity: Maintaining objectivity throughout the audit process by avoiding undue influence from time pressures, personal relationships, or other biases.
The PCAOB has identified several conditions that may impede skepticism:
- Financial incentives: Pressure to maintain long-term audit engagements or satisfy clients may reduce skepticism.
- Time pressures: Deadlines can lead to shortcuts in critical evaluations.
- Familiarity risks: Close relationships with client personnel might lead to reduced skepticism.
Professional skepticism ensures that auditors:
- Adequately assess the reliability of evidence.
- Identify risks of material misstatement.
- Reach well-supported conclusions, even under challenging circumstances.