Reporting on compliance may be done in several situations:
An auditor may be asked to report on compliance with contractual agreements or regulatory requirements in connection with a financial statement audit.
A practitioner may be asked to report on an attestation engagement regarding an entity's compliance with requirements of specific laws and regulations or on internal control over compliance.
An auditor may report on compliance and internal control over compliance as part of a single audit engagement when auditing a recipient of federal financial assistance.
Often an auditor is asked to issue a report on a client's compliance with contractual agreements or regulatory requ irements in connection with a financial statement audit. The auditor must have audited the client's financial statements and may only issue negative assurance on compliance.
This engagement is neither a compliance audit nor an attestation engagement, both of which may also be performed in relation to an entity's compliance with contractual agreements or regulatory requirements.
The attestation standards address two types of engagements:
Compliance With Specified Requirements: An entity's compliance with requirements of specified laws, regulations, rules, contracts, or grants.
Internal Control Over Compliance: An entity's internal control over compliance with specified requirements.
An SSAE report does not provide a legal determination of an entity's compliance with specified requirements. However, such a report may be useful to legal counsel or others in making such determinations.
Practitioners may be engaged to perform agreed-upon procedures or examination engagements on an entity's compliance. A practitioner should not accept an engagement to perform a review.
Attestation risk is the risk that the practitioner may unknowingly fail to modify appropriately his or her opinion. Similar to a financial statement audit, it is composed of inherent risk (assessed by auditor), control risk (assessed by auditor}, and detection risk (controlled by auditor). The audit risk of noncompliance model adapts the terminology and relationships of the audit risk model.
Audit risk of noncompliance (should be low) = Risk of material noncompliance (assessed by auditor) × Detection risk (controlled by the auditor)
When an auditor is asked to issue a report on a client's compliance with contractual agreements or regulatory requirements in connection with a financial statement audit, which of the following statements is true?