C the FIVE CARROT WARS
The following standard procedures are used in audits as risk assessment procedures, tests of controls, or substantive tests.
Inquiry
Examination/inspection
Reperformance
Auditing related accounts simultaneously
Representation letter
Substantive procedures are designed to detect material misstatements at the assertion level.
They consist of:
tests of details applied to transactions, balances, and disclosures; and
substantive analytical procedures.
Directional testing refers to testing either forward or backward.
Tracing forward from source documents to journal entries provides evidence of completeness.
Vouching backward from journal entries to source documents provides evidence of existence.
External confirmation is a form of audit evidence obtained as a direct written response to the auditor from a third party, either in paper form or by electronic or other medium. An oral response to a confirmation request does not meet the definition of an external confirmation.
When audit procedures relate to asset, liability, and equity account balances, the most relevant assertions are:
Completeness
Valuation, allocation, and accuracy
Existence and occurrence
Rights and obligations
Understandability of presentation and classification
When testing transactions, the most relevant assertions are:
Completeness
Cutoff
Valuation, allocation, and accuracy
Existence and occurrence
Understanability of presentation and classification
The objective of tests of details of transactions performed as substantive tests is to:
Attain assurance about the reliability of the information system relevant to financial reporting.
Evaluate whether management's controls operated effectively.
Auditors try to identify predictable relationships when using analytical procedures. Relationships involving transactions from which of the following accounts most likely would yield the highest level of evidence?
In determining whether transactions have been recorded, the direction of the audit testing should be from the: