An accountant must be independent of the client to issue a review report on the financial statements of such a client.
When forming a conclusion on the financial statements in a review engagement, the accountant should consider the financial statements as a whole to determine whether any modification to the conclusion in the auditor's report is appropriate. The accountant should do the following:
Evaluate whether the financial statements adequately refer to or describe the applicable financial reporting framework.
Consider whether, based on the requirements of the applicable financial reporting framework and the results of the procedures:
the terminology used, including financial statement titles, is appropriate;
the financial statements adequately disclose the significant accounting policies selected and applied and the accounting policies are consistent with the financial reporting framework;
accounting estimates made by management appear reasonable;
the information presented in the financial statements appears relevant, reliable, comparable, and understandable; and
the financial statements provide adequate disclosures to enable intended users to understand the effects of material transactions and events on the financial statements.
Consider the impact of uncorrected misstatements and qualitative aspects of the entity's accounting practices.
Consider the overall presentation, structure, and content of the financial statements, including whether the underlying transactions and events are presented fairly.
When comparative financial statements are presented, the accountant's report should refer to each period for which financial statements are presented. When reporting on all periods presented, a continuing accountant should update the report on one or more prior periods presented on a comparative basis with those of the current period. When issuing an updated report, the continuing accountant should consider information that the accountant has become aware of during the engagement for the current period financial statements. If, during the current engagement, circumstances or events come to the accountant's attention that may affect the prior period financial statements presented, the accountant should consider the effects on the accountant's report.
Under which of the following circumstances would an accountant most likely con clude that it is necessary to withdraw from an engagement to review a non issuer's financial statements?
During an engagement to review the financial statements of a non issuer, an accountant becomes aware that several leases that should be capitalized are not capitalized. The accountant considers these leases to be material but not pervasive to the financial statements. The accountant decides to modify the standard review report because management will not capitalize the leases. Under these circumstances, the accountant should:
Issue a qualified conclusion because the financial statements are materially misstated.
Express no assurance of any kind on the entity's financial statements.
Emphasize that the financial statements are for limited use only.
Disclose the departure from GMP in a separate paragraph of the accountant's report.
Gale, CPA, is engaged to review the Year 2 financial statements of North Co., a non issuer. Previously, Gale audited North's Year 1 financial statements and expressed an unmodified opinion. Gale decides to include a separate paragraph in the Year 2 review report because North plans to present comparative financial statements for Year 2 and Year 1. This separate paragraph should indicate that